Fedora can't compile

[Steve Stavropoulos]

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Michael Iatrou wrote:

> When the date was Monday 17 May 2004 02:53, Steve Stavropoulos wrote:
> 
> >  Na sou 8ymisw oti milas gia ta idia hli8ia patches pou einai hdh mesa
> > ston 2.6 kernel. 8es na mas peis dhladh oti de sou aresei o 2.6 kernel kai
> > protimas ton 2.4? H aplws de sou aresei enas 2.4 me kapoia ap' ta
> > shmantika feautures tou 2.6 backported?
> 
> Αν κάποιος θέλει τα features του 2.6, γιατί να βάλει έναν 2.4 με backported 
> features και να μην βάλει όντως τον 2.6; 

 Giati den 8elei ta panta apo ton 2.6. 1-2 pragmatakia 8elei mono. Gia ta 
ypoloipa mporei na perimenei na orimasei o 2.6.


> IMHO, όταν κάποιος επιλέγει μεταξύ του 2.4 και του 2.6 τον 2.4, το τελευταίο 
> που τον ενδιαφέρει να έχει, είναι backported τα features του 2.6!
> 

 O 2.6 den einai sto synolo tou toso stable oso o 2.4. Siga siga ayto 8a 
alla3ei, alla mexri tote h monh lysh gia kapoion pou 8elei ena _stable_ 
kai _dokimasmeno_ systhma einai na basistei ston 2.4 kai na parei apo ton 
2.6 oti 8ewrei poly shmantiko kai se kalh katastash kai na to kanei 
backport. px. polloi einai aytoi pou edw kai poly kairo 8eloun O(1) 
scheduler kai CPU/IRQ affinitty gia ta megala SMP systhmata tous, alla den 
8eloun na diakyndineysoun na alla3oun olo ton kernel tous kai na pane se 
2.5/2.6 (sou 8ymizw oti sxedon ola ta distros me 2.4 kernel exoun bgei 
otan den eixe kan bgei o 2.6.0).
 Pragmatika eisai enantia sto backporting?