(Gia ton Aarg) Re: [Fwd: [i18n] Replacing ispell with aspell]

[Simos Xenitellis]

Geia sou Aarg,
To ispell dia8etei hdh ena tetoio lejiko ellinikwn lejewn.
Opote, san prwto bima mporei na ginei metatropi i aftomati metatropi
me apotelesma na mporesei na doulepsei i elliniki or8ografia mesa apo to
Evolution kai ta alla GTK+ programmata.
O Pablo skopevei na kanei tin "tifli" metatropi basei tou grammatos tou.
Kalo einai omws kapoios na erthei se epafi mazi tou gia na dei to
apotelesma tis metatropis.

Den gnvrizw to mege8os i tin poiotita tou trexontos "lejikou" tou
ispell. Mporeis na deis an yparxei tetoia anagki apo ta URL poy
stal8ikan sti lista? H prospa8eia tou ISPELL egine prin merika xronia
apo foitites tou Panep. Aigaiou.

Gia ti lipsi ellinikvn on-line selidwn kai tin metatropi tous se lejiko
lejewn, simfwnw me ti lipsi ylikou apo online elliniko yliko kalis
poiotitas.

Filika,
simos

Την Παρ, 01-02-2002 στις 17:50, ο/η Simos Xenitellis έγραψε:
> Εντελώς τυχαία, μόλις τώρα ο Pablo έστειλε αυτό το γράμμα για τη
> μετατροπή των λεξικών των γλωσσών του ispell στο aspell.
> 
> Όπως φαίνετε, είναι εύκολο να γίνει μια τέτοια μετατροπή και ο Pablo
> διατίθεται να την ξεκινήσει. Αν κάποιος θέλει να ασχοληθεί με την
> ποιότητα του αποτελέσματος, καλό είναι να επικοινωνήσει μαζί του ή να
> γραφτεί στη σχετική λίστα συνδρομητών.
> 
> Φιλικά,
> σίμος
> 
> -----Προωθημένο Μήνυμα-----
> 
> From: Pablo Saratxaga <pablo at mandrakesoft.com>
> To: cooker-i18n at linux-mandrake.com
> Subject: [i18n] Replacing ispell with aspell
> Date: 01 Feb 2002 15:25:09 +0000
> 
> Kaixo!
> 
> Recently I learned that it is possible to create an aspell language
> file from an ispell one.
> So, I wonder if it isn't now time to do the switch (I had asked to keep ispell
> when aspell has been introduced in the distro as there were (and still are)
> several languages for which there are ispell files but not aspell ones).
> 
> aspell and ispell have different interfaces and command line parameters
> however.
> 
> So, I wondered, if we provided a shell script called "ispell" to do
> the needed compatibvility support, removed the ispell language modules
> that have an aspell one, and coverted to aspell the ones existing
> only in ispell; would that be ok ?
> 
> If you use ispell I would like to hear from you about this.
> 
> If there is no objections, I would start the switch.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >>From a packager/mantainer point of vue, the package aspell will include
> a compatibility script "ispell", and the package "ispell" will be moved
> to contrib (or at least put with a very low priority in DrakX), and have
> the binary "ispell" renamed (to "ispell.original" or something like that);
> and it main purpose would be to allow the conversion of ispell packages
> to aspell (as the process involves use of ispell to expand to a raw wordlist).
> 
> So, for packages having only ispell equivalent the build process would be:
> - create ispell hash
> - expand ispell hash to wordlist
> - convert wordlist to aspell file
> - package an rpm with the aspell files
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ki ça vos våye bén,
> Pablo Saratxaga
> 
> Není poøád májový veèer.
> 		-- holandské pøísloví
>