<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
I.Ioannou wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>On 29-Jun-99 Panagiotis Tsakiris wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> "Currently (2.3.8) _all_ filesystems are broken, except for ext2,
procfs
<BR>> and devpts. Major overhaul taking place. Current 2.3 kernels are
liable
<BR>> to corrupt filesystems badly.
<BR>>
<BR>> Stay with 2.3.6 or so, or use 2.2.7 (there are reports of filesystem
<BR>> corruption with 2.2.9 and 2.2.10, 2.2.8 is definitely toxic)
<P>Ti to kanane 2.2.x , den to afhnane 2.1.x afou akomi developers einai.
<BR>Egw lew stay with 3.0.36 :-)</BLOCKQUOTE>
Και που είσαι ακόμα. Πάρτε και κάτι ακόμα που έχει θέμα τη σταθερότητα
για να δείτε :
<P>> Linus waited a few months to open the 2.3 branch. A lot of untested
<BR>> patches were making it into the 2.2 series! People like me breathed
a sigh
<P>Only one I can think of is the 2.2.8 fiasco and I agree with that was
a bit
<BR>premature.
<P>> But that was only half right. Linus decided to hasten the release
of 2.4
<BR>> to "in the fall", and all of the developers jumped onto the 2.3 kernel,
<BR>> leaving us with a stable kernel which is totally inadequate.
<P><B>2.2.7 </B>ο σταθερότερος πυρήνας. Από εκεί και μετά το <B><FONT SIZE=+1>ΧΑΟΣ.
</FONT></B>Σε άλλο mail λέει ότι η μ.........α που έκαναν με τον
2.2.8 ίσως στοιχίσει τη σταθερότητα των επόμενων 7 - 10 πυρήνων.
<P>Τώρα καλή όρεξη :-) (σας την έκοψα έ! και πάτε όλοι να βρήτε που
χώσατε των 2.2.7 :->
<P>Παναγιώτης
<BR> </HTML>